Recognising every casualty of armed violence

TransConflict has become a signatory to the Charter for the Recognition of Every Casualty of Armed Violence, which has at its core a simple principle that ‘no person should die unrecorded’.

A Charter for the Recognition of Every Casualty of Armed Violence

This Charter is founded on the principle that no person should die unrecorded, and calls on states to uphold this principle for the victims of armed violence.

It is a universal Charter which applies equally to every person, and encompasses every party to armed violence. Its terms are few, but far-reaching.

Armed violence causes many kinds of harm to people and communities, including some that are indirect, non-lethal or delayed. This charter is for those most immediate and direct victims whose violent deaths, and identities, are all too often forever lost to the public record. It therefore applies equally to all forms and conditions of armed violence where victims are commonly unrecorded, be it due to armed conflict, extensive lethal criminality, or any other breakdown in civil security.

We, the civil society organisations and concerned parties who endorse this Charter, call for resolute action by states to ensure that every direct casualty of armed violence is:

  • Promptly recorded;
  • Correctly identified; and
  • Publicly acknowledged.

States bear particular responsibility for populations under their control or jurisdiction, or who are endangered by their actions. Information on deaths and the identity of the dead must be made public, after first informing bereaved families, where possible. Only when there is a genuine risk of harm to the living should the implementation of these measures be delayed, but never indefinitely.

While accepting that we cannot erase the harm already done to the dead, their families and friends, we are convinced that much good will flow from these measures, as they will:

  • Fulfil the rights of victims of armed violence;
  • Reduce the additional agony of not knowing the fate of loved ones who are missing, presumed dead;
  • Provide a human face to the many nameless, hidden, often distant victims of armed violence;
  • Enable more timely, transparent, reliable and comprehensive monitoring of armed violence than has been achieved before;
  • Bring states and parties to armed violence into better compliance with the spirit as well as the letter of international law; and
  • Support post-conflict recovery and reconciliation, which must always be grounded in truth.

From the moment they begin to be implemented these measures will assert and strengthen the recognition of our common humanity across the globe. In doing so, they may move us closer to a world where armed violence is no longer the scourge it is today.

TransConflict welcomes your ideas and suggestions for how to best promote the Charter and its implementation throughout the Western Balkans and elsewhere.

To keep up-to-date with the work of TransConflict, please click here. If you are interested in supporting TransConflict, please click here.



0 Response

  1. This is reasonable thinking and acting I must say.
    It seems to be the best out of the bad situation if i may put it like that. War casualties have always been present where ever and when ever it comes to a conflict of interests, and not knowing whether a dear person to you is dead or alive is connected to the lack of an inner peace .
    every life is irreplaceable and priceless ,the costly mistakes made in the past should not be repeated in future.

  2. Liz Fautsch

    This charter is a great idea. I know that the website has been doing something similar since the US invasion of Iraq. Have you been in touch with them? Maybe you could join forces or build on what they’ve done. I also think an online clock or counter that tracks casualties would be impactful. As someone who lives in the US I can say that most people here are not aware of how many casualties the US military has caused around the world. Everybody knows about our own casualties, and casualties in a conflict that has received lots of media attention, such as Darfur, for example, but Iraqi or Afghan deaths? Not so much. And even less about conflicts where the US is not directly involved. As a society, our tolerance for conflict deaths is way too high. I think this project would really make us think.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons